Joseph Duggar may face one of the most damning forms of evidence in court — his own admission — that investigators say he admitted to impure intentions in a discussion about alleged contact with a minor.
Duggar is scheduled to appear in court on Monday in the ongoing criminal case against him.
Florida affidavits obtained by Fox News Digital reveal that the case against the former reality TV star may rest not only on the victim’s account, but on his own words. According to investigators, Duggar admitted to inappropriate contact with a minor during a confrontation with the victim’s father and a subsequent recorded call coordinating with law enforcement, admitting his “intentions were not pure.”
Former federal prosecutor Nema Rahmani emphasized that the admission could be “highly relevant and damaging” to any defense put up by Duggar’s team.
Joseph Duggar’s wife wept in jail after losing custody of their four children following the pair’s arrest.
“It’s a testament to the intent, the victim and the timing of the alleged abuse,” Rahmani told Fox News Digital. “Her attorneys will try to argue that it’s too vague and weak and try to exclude it on that basis. I don’t think they’ll be successful because the statement was made in reference to Duggar admitting to inappropriate touching under the blanket. It’s impossible for a judge to separate the two statements, and that’s why they can invoke such powerful evidence.”
Read on the Fox News app
Duggar, who starred on TLC with her parents and siblings “19 Kids and Counting” He was arrested in Arkansas on March 18. Her arrest came after authorities interviewed a 14-year-old girl who claimed Duggar touched her inappropriately several times during a family vacation when she was 9 years old.
Florida Judge Brantley Clark ordered the reality TV star Held on $600,000 bond After he pleaded not guilty at his first appearance in Bay County court on March 31. He posted bail later that day.
Amy Duggar King says Joseph Duggar’s arrest exposes family’s ‘toxic system’ that ‘breeds privacy’
An affidavit filed in Bay County outlined more specific allegations about interactions during the 2020 trip.
“During the break, the defendant repeatedly asked the victim to sit on his lap,” the document states. “The victim would sit on the defendant’s lap. The defendant would hold the victim by the arms. During the break, the defendant would ask the victim to sit on the couch next to the defendant. The defendant covered the parties with a blanket.”
WATCH: Joseph Duggar jailed for child sex abuse
According to the investigation, the alleged victim, who was 9 years old at the time, claimed that Duggar inappropriately touched her genitals and thighs.
“The victim stated that the defendant’s hands were outside her underwear when these incidents occurred,” the affidavit states. “The victim said this left her uncomfortable and confused. The perpetrator eventually met with the victim and apologized for his actions. After the defendant apologized for his actions, the incidents stopped happening.”
John David, Josiah and Joseph Duggar are interviewed for “Good Morning America” in 2016.
(Getty Images)
Click here to sign up for the entertainment newsletter
Legal experts said Duggar’s own words in the affidavit could become a major point of contention as the case moves forward.
“‘My intentions were not pure’ is a statement that prosecutors like because they can frame it as a confession without the defendant fully admitting it,” criminal defense attorney Duncan Levine told Fox News Digital. “It gives them language they can put in front of a jury and say, in effect, he said it himself. But from a defense perspective, that phrase is still frustratingly vague.”
WATCH: Amy Duggar King Reacts to Joseph Duggar Arrest, ‘Toxic System’ Allegations
“This is not a clear admission of a criminal act,” Levine, who previously defended Harvey Weinstein, added. “It may reflect shame, sinful thoughts or improper intent, but criminal cases must turn on evidence of conduct, not vague language. A defense strategy is to argue that prosecutors are trying to turn a morally charged but vague statement into something more specific than it really is, and to insist that the state prove conduct as evidence rather than filling in the blank.”
What are you reading? Click here for more entertainment news
While an admission of impure intent when it comes to minors could convict the Duggars in the court of public opinion, one legal expert noted that there is a different standard when it comes to courtrooms.
“The public hears language like this and often jumps to conclusions about guilt before any evidence is presented,” Tom Maronic told Fox News Digital. “However, a jury is held to a different standard. The legal system operates on facts, statutory elements, and circumstantial evidence, not public sentiment or emotional interpretation.”
“A single vague statement, unsupported by corroborating criminal conduct, represents a significant gap between accusation and conviction,” said the criminal law attorney. “That distinction is essential in criminal defense.”
The Duggars rose to fame after the premiere of their reality TV show, “19 Kids and Counting.”
Click here to download the Fox News app
According to Maronic, Duggar’s defense strategy will likely focus on two things: the context in which the statement was made and how it was received, according to Maronic. Counsel noted that statements can be suppressed in court if obtained through leading questions, lengthy interrogations or coercive tactics.
“Beyond that, the basic logic is straightforward, something fundamentally different from talking,” explained Maronic. “The language of intent without proof of actual criminal conduct falls short of what is required for conviction.”
Original article source: Joseph Duggar’s own words may come back to haunt him in child molestation case: Experts
