Buying a car seemed like the finish line.
You picked it up, signed the paperwork, and drove out knowing the biggest expense was behind you. Now, that moment could be the start of something else entirely. General Motors is leaning hard on a model where the real money doesn’t come from selling cars, but from what happens afterward.
And the numbers show it’s already working.
GM has been building this strategy for a while, but it hasn’t been big about it. Instead, it’s stacking services around its vehicles, turning them closer to connected platforms than traditional machines.
OnStar is at its core, bundling navigation, connectivity, remote access, and safety features into one system. Add in higher-end packages, and suddenly you’re looking at Wi-Fi, streaming, and a growing list of features that don’t come with the car.
Then there’s Super Cruise, which takes things even further with hands-free driving and lane changes in certain situations. It’s the kind of feature that feels impressive at first and then gradually becomes something drivers rely on without even thinking about it.
That’s where strategy starts to make sense.
Back in 2020, GM brought in about $1.7 billion from subscription-related services. At the time, it seemed like an interesting side business, not the main focus.
Fast forward a few years, and the picture looks very different. By 2025, that number had climbed to $2.7 billion in actual revenue, with deferred revenue at $5.4 billion.
GM expects this to continue growing, projecting $3.1 billion in projected revenue and $7.5 billion in deferred revenue for 2026. Those are not small increases. That’s a company that leans on a completely different revenue model.
GM doesn’t charge everyone the second they buy a car, and that’s intentional. Instead, new vehicles come with longer trial periods that make the features feel like part of the ownership experience.
Basic OnStar services are included for up to eight years. Super Cruises are usually bundled for three. Drivers have plenty of time to get used to those features when they get behind the wheel.
When the test is over, the idea is simple. You are no longer deciding whether to use this feature. Deciding whether you want to lose it.
That is a very different decision.
From GM’s perspective, it’s more than just adding another revenue stream. It’s about changing the way money flows into a company.
Car manufacturing is expensive. Margins are tight, and costs associated with manufacturing, supply chains, and new technology continue to climb. Subscription services do not carry the same burden.
With nearly 13 million subscribers already paying for the services, and with an average of $20 a month per user, the math is quickly starting to work in GM’s favor. More importantly, those payments don’t stop after the initial sale.
They continue to come in.
GM is not doing this in isolation. The entire automotive industry is looking for ways to stay profitable in the face of massive investments in electric vehicles, software and regulatory requirements.
Recurring revenue provides a way to facilitate this. Instead of relying entirely on one-time purchases, companies can build a steady stream of income that continues long after the car has been sold.
From a business perspective, it makes sense. This creates stability in the market which is becoming unpredictable.
From the driver’s perspective, it’s a different conversation.
Not every driver needs these features.
Hands-free driving on highways may sound appealing, but if you don’t spend a lot of time on those roads, it’s less useful. In-car streaming and connectivity may be important to some, but not everyone.
That’s where the subscription model hits resistance. If a feature doesn’t feel necessary, paying for it months later starts to feel unnecessary.
And once that feeling sets in, it’s hard to reverse.
There is also the issue of data, which is already beginning to surface. Connected services collect information, and this raises questions about how that data is used and who has access to it.
Legal challenges related to privacy concerns have already arisen, and they are unlikely to disappear as these systems become more common. It adds another layer to a model that already depends on long-term customer buy-in.
Because it’s not just about features. It’s about faith.
This change changes the relationship between drivers and their vehicles.
Cars are no longer just products you buy. They are becoming platforms that evolve over time, with features added, removed or restricted based on subscriptions.
That doesn’t mean ownership is going away, but it does mean the experience is changing. The idea of paying for your car parts after you’ve already purchased them is becoming more common.
And once that becomes the norm, it’s not something that goes back easily.
GM is betting that the future of the automotive business is not just about selling vehicles. It’s about connecting drivers to those vehicles in a way that generates ongoing revenue.
If that bet pays off, buying a car won’t be the biggest financial move. This will only be the first.
And whether drivers accept that long-term relationship or start pushing back is part of deciding how far the model will actually go.
As of March 30, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: Flight) It was down 7%…
As gas prices rise, so does a scam called "pump-switching" — and it can cost…
There's a Boom in the Economy: Economics Papers on the Sour Prospects of Recent College…
WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States said Sunday it has rescued a service member missing…
Rivian (NASDAQ: RIVN ) It is trying to use new technology to break into the…
WASHINGTON (AP) — China is stepping up its diplomacy in the Iran war, making a…